I used to be an avid reader of social bookmarking sites like
Digg and
Reddit. The idea behind these types of communities is seemingly ingenious: let a democratic community decide what content makes it onto the front page and allow the community to control discussion of said content by masking troll posts and other garbage frequently found on internet chat boards. In theory, Digg and Reddit should help eliminate the media bias that seems to be more rampant than ever since readers should be able to see only the stories that are democratically elected as the best of the best.
Unfortunately, I read these websites less frequently now for a simple reason: they've deviated from what I described above. I'll contend that Digg and Reddit are now significantly more biased than any mainstream media source and that the garbage the community is supposed to control is as rampant as ever. For instance, on Reddit, at any given time I guarantee you can find stories that are pro-Ron Paul, anti-George Bush, anti-government, pro-Apple, anti-Microsoft, anti-religion, pro-atheism, and for some reason Reddit users seem to have a fetish with stories about people getting unfairly tazered. The content has gotten so biased and so predictable that it doesn't even seem worth my time any more. If someone went into a coma 50 years ago and woke up today, and their only source of information about the world was Digg and Reddit, their perception of the world would be so off the mark it would be unbelievable.
It seems that the underlying problem lies in the fact that Digg and Reddit are dominated by a niche audience and that the "democratic" system actually ends up scaring off everyone else. For example, on Digg, users have the ability to "bury" comments that they don't find worthy of being shown, effectively masking the comments from view. The original intention was to eliminate the garbage posts that pop up on internet message boards and to discourage trolls from wasting their time spamming the discussion. At first the system seemed to work great... but now the bury feature seems to be used primarily to mask opinion contrary to the Digg/Reddit mainstream. For instance, if you look at any given Digg submission on the main page, lets say one about Ron Paul... the comments will all appear to support the original submission, and a lot of the garbage you'd expect to be getting buried are actually getting "dugg," which basically means the community supports it. And forget about finding a decent discussion on Digg or Reddit; the comments section of these sites are just as bad as what you'd expect to find on
Youtube or
Yahoo Message Boards.
Sorry Digg and Reddit, the idea behind these websites is admirable, but they fail to deliver, and have certainly been a disappointment recently.